Larry J. King, ENDAUM Board member, stands at his gate and points out the area of in Churchrock, NM known as Section 8 where Hydro Resources (a subsidiary of Uranium Resources Inc.) plans to mine uranium using in situ leach methods. 
Photo by Leona Morgan

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Monday, July 23, 2012

NO URANIUM MINING IN CHURCHROCK, NEW MEXICO
UNTIL LEGACY WASTE IS CLEANED UP

CHURCHROCK, N.M. — On July 19, 2012, the uranium mining company Hydro Resources Inc. signed an agreement with the Navajo Nation giving the mining company limited access across Navajo Indian Country to its Churchrock Section 8 mine site. The agreement specifically states that Hydro Resources (a subsidiary of Uranium Resources Inc.) cannot begin mining uranium until legacy waste at Section 8 and adjacent Section 17 has been cleaned up.
Hydro Resources announced its intention to mine uranium on Section 8 and Section 17 in 1994. Community members organized themselves as the Eastern Navajo Diné Against Uranium Mining (ENDAUM) and sought the help of the nonprofit law firm New Mexico Environmental Law Center to keep irresponsible uranium mining from returning to Navajo lands. ENDAUM has kept the fight going for over a decade and Hydro Resources has yet to break ground.

ENDAUM’s mission is to ensure that the water, air, land and community health are protected. Leona Morgan, ENDAUM Coordinator explains, “ENDAUM believes it is our right as Indigenous Peoples to preserve our traditional and cultural Diné resources that may be affected if uranium mining is allowed anywhere within the Four Sacred Mountains or on other Indigenous Peoples’ homelands. ENDAUM and our allies will continue to fight for the right to safe drinking water supplies for all life, for all our relations and future generations,” says Morgan.

“Hydro Resources’ parent company, Uranium Resources Inc., is struggling to pay for clean-up at its uranium operations in Texas,” says Eric Jantz, attorney for ENDAUM. “We’re skeptical that Hydro Resources will be able to pay for clean-up at Church Rock. In any event, ENDAUM and the people of Church Rock will be watching Hydro Resources and the Navajo Nation to ensure that their land and families are protected.”

The Navajo Nation fined Hydro Resources for trespass earlier this year when the company crossed tribal trust land in order to access its property on Section 8. The agreement was made to allow Hydro Resources limited access to Section 8 and require that Hydro Resources submit to Navajo Nation jurisdiction for its operations in Indian Country as well as clean up the radioactive waste on its property before any new mining commences.

“The Navajo Nation doesn’t currently have clean-up regulations under its Superfund law — those regulations will have to be written,” says Morgan. “ENDAUM will be engaged in this process to ensure that the highest clean-up standards are adopted to protect the community.”

Interviews and Images Available Upon Request

CONTACTS:

Leona Morgan
Coordinator
Eastern Navajo Diné Against Uranium Mining
leona@endaum.com

Eric Jantz
Staff Attorney
New Mexico Environmental Law Center
ejantz@nmelc.org

FOR MORE INFORMATION:

http://nmenvirolaw.org/index.php/site/cases/hydro_resources_inc._uranium_mines/

###

Additional Online Resources:

Navajo Nation & HRI Agreement

Fully Executed Temporary Access Agreement, Signed July 19, 2012

Navajo Nation Laws

Radioactive and Related Substances, Equipment, Vehicles, Persons, and Materials Transportation Act of 2012

Diné Natural Resources Protection Act of 2005

]]> http://masecoalition.org/2012/07/no-uranium-mining-in-churchrock-nm-until-legacy-waste-cleaned-u/feed/ 0 http://masecoalition.org/2012/05/laramide-receives-draft-eis-updates-permitting-status-for-la-jara-mesa-project/ http://masecoalition.org/2012/05/laramide-receives-draft-eis-updates-permitting-status-for-la-jara-mesa-project/#comments Wed, 23 May 2012 04:32:03 +0000 admin http://masecoalition.org/?p=611 TORONTO, May 22, 2012 /CNW/ – Laramide Resources Ltd. (“Laramide” or the “Company”) is pleased to provide the following update to shareholders on the permitting status of the La Jara Mesa project in Grants, New Mexico. On May 18, 2012, the U.S. Forest Service (“USFS”) issued a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (“DEIS”) for the Company’s La Jara Mesa uranium project. The issuance of the DEIS represents a significant milestone in the mine permit process, which would allow underground development activities and mine production at the La Jara Mesa project.

With the completion of this stage of USFS’s review and notice of availability of the DEIS published in the Federal Register, there will now be a public review of the DEIS for a 60 day comment period ending 17 July 2012. Progress will continue with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) review process of La Jara Mesa, which will ultimately lead to the completion of the Final Environmental Impact Statement and Record of Decision (ROD) expected later this year.

A copy of the DEIS can be found at Laramide’s website (www.laramide.com or through the following link: http://www.fs.fed.us/nepa/nepa_project_exp.php?project=25654

Permitting Process to Date

To initiate and support the permitting process, Laramide submitted a Plan of Operations for the La Jara Mesa Project to the USFS in April of 2008 for underground development and mine production. As a result of the Plan of Operations, the USFS determined the need for an Environmental Impact Statement, which has been ongoing since May of 2009. The Plan of Operation is also available on the Company’s website. It is important to note that Homestake Mining Company (“Homestake”) had a similar Plan of Operations for the La Jara Mesa project reviewed and approved by the USFS in 1984 and 1988. In both cases, Homestake chose not to enter into production because of steep declines in the price of uranium.

La Jara Mesa Overview

La Jara Mesa project is located in the prolific Grants Mineral Belt, 10 miles northeast of the town of Grants in Cibola County, New Mexico, USA.  La Jara Mesa is a sandstone hosted roll-front style deposit with an NI 43-101 compliant mineral resource estimate with a Measured and Indicated mineral resources totaling 7,257,817 pounds of uranium (U3O8) that are contained in 1,555,899 tons at an average grade of 0.23% U3O8, and an additional 3,172,653 pounds of U3O8 contained in 793,161 tons at an average grade of 0.20% U3O8 as Inferred mineral resources on the property. Considerable historic uranium exploration activity has been completed on La Jara Mesa by companies such as United Nuclear Corporation, Gulf Resources and Homestake. These companies performed exploration work, comprising of over 700 drill holes as well as metallurgical test work. Historical metallurgical studies on La Jara Mesa exhibited strong recoveries and potential underground access is quite straightforward via an inclined ramp from the valley floor. The Company also believes the project has additional exploration potential to expand current mineral resources. The resource lies approximately 700 feet below the surface and approximately 500 to 800 feet above the water table.

To learn more about Laramide, please visit the Company’s website at www.laramide.com.

The technical information in this news release has been prepared in accordance with the Canadian regulatory requirements set out in NI 43-101 and reviewed by Peter Mullens, Vice President of Exploration, Laramide Resources Ltd., a qualified person under NI 43-101 guidelines.

via LARAMIDE RESOURCES LTD. | Laramide Receives Draft EIS and Updates Permitting Status for La Jara Mesa Project.

I know this because I am Diné (Navajo) and live in Church Rock, New Mexico – only yards away from a proposed new uranium mine. As a resident and former miner, I have experienced the effects of uranium exploitation first-hand. Many of my relatives and neighbors, including myself, have suffered health problems due to working at or living near the mines.  In fact, one study has found that cancer rates among Navajo living near mine tailings are several times higher than the national average.

Knowing the inherent risks of this industry, I am concerned about the long-term effects and threats to the safety and health of our people, our water, and local plants and animals.  An elementary school sits near the proposed uranium processing plant and I am concerned about the safety of my community.

In 1989, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency gave Hydro Resources, Inc. an “aquifer exemption.” This permit allows Hydro Resources to destroy part of the aquifer beneath our community in order to extract uranium through in situ leach processing (ISL). The EPA did this before our community even knew about the proposal.

Recently, something unprecedented happened: the EPA agreed to revisit that 1989 decision. With new evidence of how ISL mining contaminates groundwater and recent health studies, we hope the EPA reconsiders all the facts and revokes Hydro Resources’ aquifer exemption. In a region where many Diné families still live without running water, water if life!

Revoking this permit could be our last chance to protect our community from this mine.

Our communities have already experienced excessive mental anguish and health impacts because of past mining. How can the EPA allow this poisonous uranium processing in our aquifer when our people rely on this water for our future?

The EPA has a rare opportunity to right a terrible wrong before new damage occurs.  Please help us to protect our community water resources by urging the EPA to revoke this aquifer exemption IMMEDIATELY before the company has a chance to begin contaminating our groundwater with uranium.

Thank you,

Larry J. King

Eastern Navajo Diné Against Uranium Mining (ENDAUM)

Church Rock, NM

via Human Rights Petition: EPA: Don’t Sacrifice Navajo Water for Uranium Mining | Change.org.

ALBUQUERQUE Environmental groups are hopeful that a decision by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to reconsider a permit for a uranium mining operation in western New Mexico could lead to the end to the project.

Members of Eastern Navajo Dine Against Uranium Mining and the New Mexico Environmental Law Center had voiced concerns to the EPA about deficiencies in the decades-old permit application.

Larry King, a member of the Navajo group that has been fighting plans by Hydro Resources Inc. to start mining near Church Rock, said it’s crucial the EPA revoke an exemption that would allow for mining that could impact groundwater sources.

“The EPA has a rare opportunity to right a terrible wrong before new damage occurs,” King said.

He has started an online petition drive that calls on the EPA to protect Church Rock’s drinking water. He said the community has repeatedly expressed its opposition to in-situ leach mining in the area through resolutions, lawsuits and a 2005 Navajo law that banned uranium mining on the sprawling reservation over concerns about disease and death.

via Groups urge EPA to revoke uranium permit – Farmington Daily Times | NM Native News | Scoop.it.

Posted: May 9, 2012

Written by

MANUEL QUINONES, Greenwire

Environmental advocates are pressing U.S. EPA to revoke a key permit for a planned uranium mining facility in northwestern New Mexico adjacent to the Navajo Nation.

The New Mexico Environmental Law Center and Eastern Navajo Diné Against Uranium Mining say EPA is reconsidering a 23-year-old aquifer exception for Uranium Resources Inc.’s project in the community of Church Rock, N.M. It is an area already polluted by past mining activities.

“There is a long legacy and many unhealed sores from uranium mining on Navajo land by companies that look to make a quick profit,” said ENDAUM board member Larry King, calling EPA’s action “unprecedented.” “I’m sick of watching my community suffer from the poisons of uranium mining.”

An aquifer exception is essential for the “in-situ recovery” or “in-situ leach” uranium mining method. The process generally involves pumping water, oxygen and sodium bicarbonate to free uranium underground and then suck it to the surface.

Industry leaders say it is a safer and cleaner way of mining uranium. They say EPA does not give projects aquifer exceptions unless groundwater is already polluted. Companies are not allowed to pollute drinking water (Greenwire, Dec. 23, 2011).

But environmentalists and wary residents say ISL uranium recovery puts people at risk, especially in areas like northwestern New Mexico, where residents rely on wells for drinking water.

Eric Jantz, an attorney for NMELC, which has been helping ENDAUM fight new mining for years, said it “would contaminate potable water with radiation and heavy metals, making it unfit for consumption forever. The EPA has both the legal authority and moral obligation to revoke the aquifer exemption.”

The groups have collected more than 9,000 signatures on the activism website change.org. But neither EPA nor the company are saying much about the potential of blocking the Church Rock project.

A regional spokesman for the agency said in a recent statement, “I can confirm EPA Regions 6 and 9, as well as the Navajo Nation are discussing the issue.” Uranium Resources spokesman Mat Lueras said, “URI has not received any notification by the EPA on any action at this time.”

In 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear ENDAUM’s case against the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s license for the projects. Hoping to attract international support, last year the group filed a complaint with the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (Greenwire, May 16, 2011).

NRC regulates in-situ uranium facilities in cooperation with EPA and state agencies. Oversight can vary depending on state agreements with the federal government.

EPA is reviewing standards for uranium mining waste to see whether changes are necessary. The agency is focusing on in-situ recovery because of its increased popularity. A spokeswoman said the rules were last revised in the mid-1990s.

EPA is also working on new standards dealing with radon gas emissions from mining and milling waste under the Clean Air Act. But last October the agency approved waste piles and an evaporation pond for a conventional mill in Colorado (E&ENews PM, Oct. 27, 2011). Environmentalists had wanted the rules overhauled before the project proceeded.

Even with uranium prices hovering at about $50 per pound, lower than a high of $73 before the Japanese nuclear meltdown, companies are moving forward with increased mining in the United States to power the world’s nuclear reactors.

Colorado-based Ur-Energy Inc., for example, is close to finishing the permitting process for its Lost Creek in-situ project in Sweetwater County, Wyo., a top uranium-producing state.

The Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality issued a key permit for the project last year, just weeks after it got its NRC license. And the Bureau of Land Management released an environmental impact statement late last month.

via Activists mount campaign for EPA to scrap N.M. uranium mine permit || Red Lodge Clearinghouse.